Jurors would be creating a grave mistake if they give Moussaoui the death penalty.
As much as it is seen as the fair punishement for the sole person on trial in connection with the 911 attacks on the United States, the death penalty for this defendant, may just exacerbate the situation of US national security, while strengthening the resolve of Al Qaeda militants and extremists to fight the "infidels".
Under normal circumstances, in the US justice system at least, the death penalty would be a fitting punishment, but this situation can hardly be considered customary. The death penalty in this situation could be viewed by such groups as a mandate for reprisal, as in this case Moussaoui would become an unquestionable martyr of sorts- having been killed by the 'unholy' Americans.
In light of the recent developments regarding the cessation of funding to Palestine,
a video from Al Qaeda threatening more attacks in the US and Australia, and Islamist groups' ideologies about the West and dying for their cause, perhaps the jury overseeing this trial should be a little cautious when it comes to the death penalty.
__________________________________________
I recall an initial sense of awe when CNN
announced that
Zacarias Moussaoui (aka "Zac", and the only suspect being prosecuted in relation to the 911 bombings in New york) had admitted to being part of the plot to hijack planes during 911, along with
Richard Reid (the Shoe Bomber).
My awe turned to suspicion and disbelief a few minutes into my absorption of the story, but I
clearly wasn't alone. I formulated a thesis, that Moussaoui had nothing to do with the initial planning of the September 11 attacks, but he instead wants the death penalty in order to fulfill his role as an Al Qaeda martyr.
Sure enough, the news today have strengthened my suspicions. The latest reports out of the courtroom quote Moussaoui as
resisting efforts by his lawyers to portray him as insane.
The prosecution this week has elicited powerful, wrenching testimony from witnesses to the attacks, and survivors and family members of victims. Prosecutors also played tapes of 911 messages from victims in the World Trade Center. On Wednesday, the jury heard the cockpit voice recorder from United Flight 93 as terrorists seized control of the plane and slashed the pilots' throats.
Moussaoui was uncooperative with his defense lawyer, Gerald Zerkin, presenting Zerkin with handwritten questions he wanted him to ask. But he seemed happy to cooperate when cross-examined by the government.
"Are you crazy?" asked lead prosecutor Robert Spencer.
"I am not," Moussaoui said.
"Are you delusional?"
"I am not."
Spencer asked him if a suicide attack was an act of madness.
"It is not crazy," he said.
Was he ashamed of his role in the Sept. 11 conspiracy? "There is no remorse for justice," Moussaoui said. "... No regret. No remorse."
Would he do it again tomorrow? Would he take flying lessons again tomorrow and pilot a hijacked plane into the White House, as he testified last month he was preparing to do.
"Today," Moussaoui said.
Source